Tuesday, June 6, 2017

On Shawn Lucas Doing this and Then Mysteriously Croaking (from a Drug Overdose - a Fellow Who Purportedly Never Did Drugs EVER) One Month Later

   Yeah, at this point, I think that I'd rather be in Afghanistan than anywhere near the Clintons, Wasserman Schultz, etc. (the fact that over there you at least have a prayer of staying alive, for Christ). Big time.

Monday, June 5, 2017

My Apology to Van Jones (Yeah, You Heard Me)

I've given Mr. Jones a lot of grief over the years for his brief experience in the 9/11 Truth Movement and, while I'm still not a big fan of the guy overall (the dude's affinity for green energy boondoggles, his propensity to play the race-card on occasion, etc.), I realize now that I was wrong to do that. In fact, if the guy can be criticized at all for this subject, it's that he didn't keep to the strength of his convictions and try to educate the citizens (a la, David Ray Griffin, Richard Gage, Steven Jones, Paul Thompson, etc.). Granted, maybe he didn't know much about it and was just being a knee-jerk partisan who ultimately realized that his career would be toast if he didn't repent......but, still................................................................................................P.S. And, yes, let me specify one more time that I am not accusing anyone in particular here (though, yes, the way that Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and Cheney come across here is hardly reassuring - that I will admit to), just that there are a myriad of unanswered questions and that it was exceedingly unfair of me to trash Jones the way that I did without having looked into the matter myself. That's all. 

Saturday, June 3, 2017

Edgy?

Nah, not really. Not anymore.............Now if she was presenting an Obama or Hillary head, MAYBE (the fact that that would at least be cutting against the grain a bit)

On the Group, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

I used to think that 9/11 truthers were bonkers and many of them clearly are (the no planes theorists, for example), but when you have over 1,500 architects and engineers telling you that the official explanation is bullshit, that's a hell of a lot more difficult to brush aside. And they do make a great many compelling points; a) the fact that all three buildings in Manhattan came down at free-fall or near free-fall speed, straight in to their own footprints, and in a symmetrical manner (something that could have only taken place with explosives), b) the fact that there was evidence of nano-thermite all throughout the rubble (a tell-tale sign of explosives), c) the fact that there were hundreds of witnesses (including media people) who claimed to have heard explosions, d) that fact that no high-rise structure had ever collapsed due to fire prior to 9/11, e) the fact that the fires in all three buildings were hydrocarbon-based, oxygen-starved, and nowhere near hot enough to create molten-steel (you could literally see it dripping down from the twin towers), f) the fact that the debris from the falling buildings was catapulted hundreds of feet outward (yet another signature of controlled demolitions), g) the fact that there were subtle signs of squibs happening well below where the planes had impacted and well below the fires, etc., etc......................................................................................................Look, I'm not saying that 9/11 was necessarily an "inside job" but at the very least there needs to be a much more thorough investigation than what the 9/11 Commission (the executive director of which had been on the Bush transition team and a member of his Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board) and N.I.S.T. gave us. THAT I will say.    

On the Fact that the Left's Definition of a "Botched Robbery" Is Apparently One In Which the Dude Is Shot Twice In the Back and Nothing Is Taken................and the Dozen or so Street Cameras Aren't Working............and the Police Have Zero Leads

Now THAT'S a "conspiracy theory".