On the Fact that if Climate Change (Previously Known as Global Warming Before the Slight-of-Hand) Truly Was this Existential Threat to the Earth, Wouldn't it Be Logical to Think that the Green New Deal Would Be 100% About that and NOT 70% About Social Justice Foolishness?

It's an elementary question that even a 6th-grader would probably think of and yet I haven't heard a damned one of these supposedly professional journalists ask it. Pathetic, huh (the absolute lack of professionalism, critical thinking, inquisitiveness, etc.)?