Monday, April 7, 2008

Take No Prisoners, Equal Opportunity

Alright, here it is, Bill. As much as I hate to admit it, you are in fact right about one thing. There are a whole shit-load of far-left loons out there (clearly, as you can see, I'm dealing with a couple of them myself right now). And, no (and, yes, here's where you're frigging wrong again), I'm not talking about "Media Matters" (damn those bastards for quoting you verbatim/in total) or even the "Daily Kos", for Christ! I'm talking about these totally marginalized/misguided lunatics, whose postings on politics and society border on the delusional (John McCain was actually a traitor during the Vietnam War, the United States attacked itself on 9/11, etc.) - objectively so, I'm saying!.....................................Of course, having said this, I still reserve the opportunity to lance you with at least a modicum of perspective. The vast, vast, majority of these imbeciles (Existentialist Cowboy, Lydia Cornell/her henchmen, etc.) have little in the way of influence (virtually none, when compared to such double-digit douche-bags as Limbaugh, Savage, Hannity, etc.), regarding the process. So, yes, in that regard, O'Reilly, everything completely returns to form/YOU'RE WRONG!!

13 comments:

Voltron said...

One thing they leave out of their McCain narrative, at least as far as him shredding papers documenting Vietnam war POW's is that their hero John F. Kerry was right there beside him helping out.

As to O'Reilly, when he first started out he WAS pretty damn good. I think somewhere down the line success went to his head. He's so arrogant these days that I don't watch him often. Usually only when he has a guest on that I like. (Or guest host - I have to admit I like Laura Ingraham, and I do like the Dennis Miller segments) Bill's radio show is completely un-listenable for me. I tune that out the minute he comes on.

One thing about Rush Limbaugh though, when somebody starts knocking him I can tell they've never listened to his show for any length of time. There are a lot of "inside" comments and running gags that you can't pick up from just a casual listen. Most lefties don't listen long enough to catch the complete context. You may not agree with his opinions, but he's rarely if ever mean spirited. Air(heads) America has more mean spiritedness in one hour than Rush does in a month.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

You sound like measured fellow (me, I'm not always one). The only thing I'm not with you on is Laura Ingraham. I'm not a fan, especially (as some of my blogs clearly underscore LOL). That's O.K., though, right?

Voltron said...

Yeah, thats OK...LOL

And I'm not always 'measured' either. I AM a Conservative, AND I sometimes think Rush is too liberal.

Voltron said...

Oh, and meet Mikey.

He's the blog guard dog. Kind of a Pit Yorkie. Yaps a lot, but hasn't bitten yet...

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

Mikey? Quite a regiment. It reminds me of that scene from "Requiem for a Heavyweight", when the gangster goes to Anthony Quinn, "So, you beat up a couple of bums. Big deal. I got a whole regiment of them."

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

Voltron, check out kernsux.blogspot.com He goes by the name of j. Very idiosyncratic, hard to pin down but interesting.

THU said...

I find it quite interesting sir that you have become corrupted by that very thing you obsess over and claim to detest sir.

You sir doth protest too much, you oft infer Mr O'Reilly as a ruffian, a scoundrel and a yob, for his bias and disdain for facts, coupled with his smarmy and snide personal attacks, and yet sir rather than repudiating this vile sod and his insidious tactics with actions, you merely do so with empty words and rhetoric bereft of any sincerity sir, while behaving in similar fashion, in other words sir you have become that which you detest.

As Votron so eloquently stated, battle not with monsters lest you become one sir. Perhaps you have been brooding over Mr O'Reilly for far too long. Lets examine the facts regarding precisely how you entered the blog yesterday shall we sir?You entered Ms Cornell's blog as a fresh faced guest and immediately proceeded to show complete and utter disdain for the facts., despite a loyal and courteous blogger pointing out that the post was not written by Ms Cornell but by another blogger you proceeded with your heinous tirade attempting to besmirch Ms Cornell's integrity, you then resorted to vile personal attacks and insults sir even stooping so low as to engage in the very tactic of character assassination that you accused Ms Cornell of inflicting on candidate Mccain.

You followed up your heinous tirade of personal attacks and as you say character assassination on the blog host with a shall we say a less than honest dodgy conspiracy utterly bereft of factual evidence wherein you accused more than one blogger of attacking you, when as several have now recognized, you sir only interacted with blogger Clif, a solitary individual. You sir followed up this rather dubious and dishonest act with inveterate lies when you proceeded to insinuate Ms Cornell was inciting as you say her minions to ravage and attack, once again bereft of the most minute shard of factual evidence to support this farcical lie. The truth of this matter as stated previously by several reasoned bloggers is that when you made this rather dodgy and dishonest statement you had only interacted with blogger Clif. Further sir after stating you loathe and detest labels you proceed to label every individual who frequents this blog with one dishonest sweeping generalization after a mere several hours, this after stating you detest character assassination but engaging in said activity on the blog host and other bloggers you lied were ravaging and attacking you.

I therefore beseech you sir to redeem your honor and integrity by apologizing to our blog host and the other individuals who frequent this blog for your heinous and utterly unwarranted personal attacks and your rather insidious disdain for facts, and rampant dishonesty lest you become the very monster you vehemently claim to oppose.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

I attack, yes, but I do so without an agenda. The post, 2 Faces of a Deceiver" was character assassination. I took it to task. Just like I've taken others to task for unfairly attacking Al Gore. Look, you're confused. I understand. You're not used to dealing with a nonpartisan, a nonyes-man. And, come on, that was a funny line, "as for that 'hilarious' show of yours, I'd rather stare at a chalk-ouline of Sal Mineo for a half-hour." What's that? Oh, alright, I won't quit my day-job.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

And what about you guys? Every other sentence from these rambling missives of yours has a derogatory feel. At least I try and instill some humor and, yes, get to the God-damned point! Besides, it's not the fact that I "attack" that bothers you. It's the fact that I attacked the wrong person. If it was a Republican that I was attacking (and, believe me, I've done that plenty), you'd be frigging high-fiving me, for Christ! As for your comments on O'Reilly, my main problem with the fellow is that he claims to be impartial and isn't. That, and the fact that he frigging lies/projects his own inadequacies on others. His attack-dog tactics are farther down the list.

clif said...

That, and the fact that he frigging lies/projects his own inadequacies on others

pot meet kettle

Anonymous said...

CALLING ALL NEGATIVE POSTERS, LISTEN UP: I have known Will for over 30 years...we went to college together and I consider him a close friend. I can not believe some of the comments posted here recently...(Thu, Clif, et al.)None of this stuff even comes close to describing Will. Will and I have discussed politics, history, philosophy, etc for many years now. I may not always agree with him, but I always come away with something. Isn't that how a real dialogue should be??? Face it: None of us likes criticism or to have our core beliefs challenged. It remains a fact that sometimes there is more to reality than what we stubbornly cling to...(a novel concept for hyper partisans to be sure.) Namecalling does not advance the conversation one bit. Nor does pious rationalization (Thu in particuliar.)

I hear critics say Will is a attack dog...I don't see any points or counter arguments made. You barge in and cry foul. Thu, your prose reminds me of Puff Pastry...nice to look at but full of air...can you at least provide some TERSE counter points please!...windy rants help nothing. A tip of the cap to Voltron...at least he's civil. Come on guys snap out of it. The fate of our country hangs in the balance. We need some serious discusion.

Thanks Will. I warned you would face this kind stuff. Chin up dude! Some people do get it! MK

Tom said...

"CALLING ALL NEGATIVE POSTERS, LISTEN UP: I have known Will for over 30 years...we went to college together and I consider him a close friend."

Such a "close friend" your posting anonymously ..... classic.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

Thank you, my brother (MK). The check is in the mail (see, Thu, I'm a funny guy). Funny, isn't it, though. They don't seem to have any trouble with my anti-George Bush polemics