Friday, September 26, 2008

When the Dullard(s) Come Home to Roost

Just for the record, folks, Cliffolaus is back again. And, yes, this mostly barbaric incarnation of Cliffy/his paranoid personality disorder/his schizo-affective disorder (steroids driven, of course), damned if he isn't just as comically deranged as he's ever been; the son-of-a-bitch. Of course, the fact that he's bankrupt, apparently, to the point of having NOTHING superior to do, of him....spending an entire life in such a virtual wasteland, etc., how could you not AS WELL have at least a smidge of sympathy - bastardly son-of-a-bitch or not, I'm saying?

33 comments:

Anonymous said...

Will ever hear the word slander?
You can express these thoughts marked as opinion, but put out there like this old son... it's a civil offense that could cost you if someone should choose to expose your very thin veil of anonymity.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

That "someone" would be laughed out of court. I suppose this isn't you, either, "son". Douchebag.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

I suppose, then, that Voltron could sue you for all of the times you accused him of "sock puppetry". We could split a lawyer maybe. What an ass.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

And come to think of it, you nimrods accused me of being that Russian guy. Hm, I think I might have a case here. LOL

Anonymous said...

Crusty the clown, a gutless yellow bellied PUSSY who is all talk and NO balls ..... who'd a thunk it.

Anonymous said...

BTW will, I never post as nicholas, probably somebody who wants you to think it is me though, to rile you up once again, since it seems so easy to do .......

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

I'm not riled at all, Clif. I calmly and dispassionately delete that lunacy.

Anonymous said...

Well then except for the ONE anonymous post, you have never deleted MY posts.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

That's correct, Clif. I've only deleted the sexually inappropriate comments by "Nicholas" and "anonymous".

Anonymous said...

Well if you deleted any posts by who ever is nicholas, you haven't delete MY posts.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

Who else has that much spare time/depravity?

IrOnY RaGeD said...

Will,

A difference which makes no difference IS no difference...
(stole that one from Spock, Mr. not Dr.)

If nicholas isn't Clif, then he's a Clif wannabe, which makes him just as lame or lamer than Clif. After all who'd wannbe Clif?

And me thinks Clif does NOT protest too much. If it were me, I would extremely object to someone copying my style to invite the comparison even if they weren't posting under my alias.

And I don't see Clif going after nicholas...

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

Betwixt you and Spock, I think the matter's just been put to rest.

Anonymous said...

Far from it widdle will,

I don't give a fuck what nicholas writes on your waste of bandwidth,

Your BFF duncetron's argument is kinda weak like MOST of his utterances and crusty's spine.

I also don't run around the tubes like don Quixote, trying to make everyone stop writing what I don't like which seems to be your main mantra.

It seems your thin skin is your real problem son.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

I don't care what Cliffolaus writes, either. I just don't my blog cluttered with the sexullly inappropriate crap of a lunatic that apparently has no life. Comprehend?

Anonymous said...

Well since nicholas ain't me son, your crying to the wrong person stupid.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

Why don't you join me then, Clif, in condemning this person's homophobia, his using of homosexuality as an insult, etc.? I mean, as a true progressive, you should certainly be aghast at such ignorant and prejudicial behavior, correct?

Anonymous said...

Sorry will, but YOU are gonna have to learn to fight your own battles son, don't keep asking crusty the big pussy and duncetron to be your key board commandos.

I don't have time to fight your battles for you.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

I didn't ask you to "fight my battles", Clif. I asked you to be a pricipled progressive and condemn homophobia. You are a principled progressive aren't you? This, I'm saying, as opposed to a hypocrite.

Anonymous said...

Sorry will but your don Quixote routine has run thin,

fight your own battles son.

It is after all your waste of bandwidth isn't it?

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

You obviously can't read. Unpricipled progressive, check.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

Sorry, Clif. That sentence made no sense. Hey, what's your position on "don't ask, don't tell", by the way? Seriously, what does Mr. "progressive" think about that one?

Anonymous said...

Don't care.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

Oh, so discrimination against the gay community is not an important matter in YOUR progressive world, interesting.

Anonymous said...

Sorry numbnuts but military policy DISCRIMINATES all the time.

NO druggies,

No tattoos,

No gang bangers,

No criminals,

Age discrimination,

Weight discrimination,

sex discrimination in certain MOS's,

They force certain life styles and attitudes and punish others which is a form of discrimination,


so fuck off stupid.

It is painfully obvious you KNOW nothing about the military NOTHING.

besides why should I be forced to conform to YOUR idea of what a progressive is supposed to be,

not very progressive if you ask me.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

You're comparing homosexuality to drug-addiction, gang-banging, criminality, etc.? Wow, you're even more of a frigging bigot than I thought.

Anonymous said...

No moron, I am trying to show your little mind how other things which could be called discrimination like whether you have tattoos are considered discrimination because the US military refiuses to allow them.

Especially how they discriminate against heavy people and have for decades.

YES the United States Army used to make us weight everyone and them make those over weight to lose their weight or I HAD to discharge them.

They had it written in the regulations, and had various ways to figure out how to determine how met standards and who didn't.

They even had a part of the regulation for females to recover their "authorized weight" after a pregnancy.

The weight control program was about image and nothing else because a soldier who excelled at their job, and could pass the Physical Fitness test, faced discharge for being heavier then the pentagon written standards.

BTW just so's ya know son, I never was too heavy for the Army, but I watch soldiers who were good at their job and an asset to their units and the army sent home just because their DNA made them heavy, and I say that because they did PT which is exercise to you, and were in good shape because they could pass the Army Physical Fitness Test twice a year, but still were above the approved weight.

I am NOT kidding.

I fought hard to keep a younger soldier who had a weight problem, he was heavy but was good at the EOD job and had very steady nerves, which is important when you are walking up on a live bomb.

We used every trick in the book to get him past each bi-annual weigh in.

When he was sent on to his next unit, I called his new CO and explained how good a soldier I though he was, and the next CO said he understood. Well the guy was sent to northern Iraq during Operation Provide Comfort, and I read the report where he threw his helmet and a flak vest then fell on a grenade to save his fellow soldiers. he was wounded but survived, however according to US army standards he was too not qualified just because of his weight.

Now I really don't give a flying fuck about your little attempts at drama here because YOU have never faced what the vets YOU slime have asshole.

SO GFY or the trolls you seem to run with.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

Keeping drug addicts, gang-bangers, and crooks out of the military isn't discrimination, Clif. Keeping somebody out for his/her sexual orientation is. Do I really have to explain the difference here? And there you go again, attempting to punctuate the conversation with "I was in the military and you weren't." Getting stale.

Anonymous said...

Sorry Bozo, but discrimination IS discrimination, and they discriminate against tattoos, and heavy people which YOU are ignoring to keep your drama going asshole.

Your just an anti veteran bigot and have proved it in spades.

Anonymous said...

The comment wasn't I was in the military and widdle will wasn't numbnuts, it was to show how the military WORKS asshole, something YOU know not a DAMN thing about, which you have also proved in spades.

Damn you're the most ignorant blow hard I have ever met.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

Clif, Clif, you put drug-addicts, criminals, and gang-bangers in the same category as homosexuals. THAT is just beyond the pale and you really should apologize. Drug addicts can't do the job, Clif. Gay Americans can AND WANT TO!! As for weight (I notice you keep bring THAT up, rather than repeat the druggie/criminal comment), I think that that depends on whether they can do the job. If they can, they should be able to serve. If, however, their weight precludes them doing so, they shouldn't be allowed to serve. Civil rights are really very elementary, douche-bag. Tattoos? I could care less if somebody has one. I'm more interested if they can shoot straight, speak Arabic, etc.. And AGAIN with the Anti-Veteran bigot stuff. You don't know shit, pal. I respect 99% of the soldiers and vets out there. In fact, except for you and this 1138 bozo, I can't even think of one (short of McVeigh and the Abu Garib ass-holes, of course) that I don't respect. And that's part of the reason I didn't want GWB to send our troops over to Iraq. I didn't want them to needlessly come home in body bags, ass-hole. Fuck you, Clif.

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

Hopefully, Obama, if in fact he is elected, will get rid of that don't ask/don't tell policy. I mean, I can't imagine him thinking that it's fair.

Anonymous said...

Fuck you, Clif.

Thin skin showin' again boy .... you'd never have survived basic pussy boy.