Monday, February 9, 2015

On Connecticut's Plan to Impose a Penny Per Ounce Tax on Sugary Drinks

I'll take, "Yet Another Regressive Tax/Stab at Social Engineering that Reams the Consumer and Seemingly Works at Cross-Purposes", for a Thousand, Alex.

6 comments:

Les Carpenter said...

I am glad I don't drink sugary drinks EACH, anywhere.

Except alcohol occasionally.

dmarks said...

Greed, of course, and extreme arrogance of a "nanny state" using tax policy to enforce morality.

Do you agree with me, Will, that all taxes should be with an eye toward absolutely no impact on behavior?

Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

I do.

Les Carpenter said...

That my friends is both a theoretical and practical impossibility.

BB-Idaho said...

Here in the potato state, every
morsel of food is taxed. But, we privatized our legal department,
paying $285/hr, rather than the
previous $92/hr. And some folks
still believe that only the gov worker feeds at the taxpayer trough. As far as sugar drinks, you preach to the choir: my plain pipe tobacco now costs $37/can.

dmarks said...

Not with the corruption and arrogance of those in power.