On the Fact that if Kim Dotcom Was Coming Forward and Giving Testimony to Support the Trump, Russia Narrative, POS Journalists Like CNN's Oliver Darcy and the Washington Post's Dave Weigel Would Be Celebrating the Guy but Because He's Providing Testimony that Seth Rich Was the Wikileaks Source and Not Russia, They're Vilifying Him

Funny how that works, huh (and by funny, I of course mean morally repugnant, intellectually dishonest/lazy, shameless, idiotic, and partisan to a 1970s wrestling and comic-book degree)?