On the Fact that(According to Esteemed Researcher, Daniele Fanelli) Negative Results in Science Journals (Where the Null Hypothesis Isn't Rejected) Have All but Disappeared - http://eloquentscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Fanelli12-NegativeResults.pdf

You need a smoking-gun as proof that modern science is corrupt? This ought to do it, folks (the fact that the odds of this happening without somebody pressing their fingers on the scale IS ZERO). YES SIR......................................................................................................P.S. And, yes, the other smoking-gun is of course the fact that whenever criminals (and that's what these folks are in my estimation) such as Ben Santer, Micheal Mann, Ken Briffa, and James Hanson "adjust" the data it is invariably to the benefit of their theory - yet another statistical impossibility.