Thursday, October 20, 2011
Less Than "Zero"
I'm going to be honest, folks. While I didn't see the entirety of yesterday's Republican debate, what I did see was more than sufficient. You had five lunatics (Perry, Bachmann, Cain, Gingrich, and Santorum), an interesting fellow who you wouldn't mind having as a college professor but couldn't quite see as President (Paul), and a phony baloney (Romney - sad, in that, if the fellow just went back to being who he was before this "metamorphosis", he probably wouldn't be half-bad). And the fact that I consider myself an open-minded and persuadable swing-voter - that, folks, made it all the more frustrating! Oh well, here's to yet another cycle of having to vote for the lesser......
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
You are only voting for the lesser if you vote republican. The democrat in the election will be the better.
Mr. Obama is a decent chap, Jerry, I agree. But to say that I will be voting for him with enthusiasm would be a lie, and I certainly don't want to lie to you.
Personally, I like the idea of voting for the person who will be the better president rather than the less evil president.
And I don't want to lie to you, either.
I like that idea, too, Jerry. It just doesn't always mesh with views, perceptions, etc.. Michael Bloomberg, now there's a fellow who I'd be voting FOR.
Post a Comment