What would be my answer to the question, "So, what do you find more irritating; Sarah Palin's inane and often divisive 'commentary', or the smarmy/'holier than thou' critiques of this commentary by left-wing radio and cable hosts?"
I can't see her winning, double b....It just seems like the electorate has a certain threshold of craziness (i.e., Angle, O'Donnell, etc.) that they're simply not willing to cross/obliterate.
I hear what you're saying anon.. I just don't think that Palin is even another Reagan. At least the latter spent time reading books and developing a world view/philosophy. Palin - she's still shamelessly stuck in the bromide stage.
Truth, I don't revere Reagan. But I do respect him. And Palin IS NOT another Reagan (and if in fact the right thinks that she is, then they definitely need a collective lobotomy).
The question, double be, was what do I, Will Hart, find more irritating......Also, I've found that partisan firebrands usually don't make for reliable Presidential historians. If it doesn't bother you too much, I think I'll look to people like Doug Brinkley and Doris Kearns Goodwin for perspective.
11 comments:
Following my Zen-like philosophy I can easily ignore the pundits, left or right. Like I said before, if I don't listen to their shit it doesn't exist.
But since the Marching Morons could elect Sarah POTUS, she is a different matter.
I can't see her winning, double b....It just seems like the electorate has a certain threshold of craziness (i.e., Angle, O'Donnell, etc.) that they're simply not willing to cross/obliterate.
People thought the very same in 1979 about the first right wing fraud also.
You know the guy who raised taxes on over 90% of the USA but people buy the lie he cut all our taxes.
PS he didn't "end or "win" the Cold War, the TROOPS did, under presidents stretching from Truman to Bush Sr.
Happy Veterans Day to all the troops.
I hear what you're saying anon.. I just don't think that Palin is even another Reagan. At least the latter spent time reading books and developing a world view/philosophy. Palin - she's still shamelessly stuck in the bromide stage.
For the life of me I just dont understand you leftys obsession with all things Palin.It really is a bit creepy.Dont ya think.
Russ, I've really and truly tried to like her. Hell, I've even defended her on occasion. But it's HARD....She makes it hard.
I'm plenty tired of Palin Rusty but for some reason you righties keep her at the forefront of your party.
Are you guys that desperate for a face that you will parade her around till a Reagan clone is successfully produced?
Truth, I don't revere Reagan. But I do respect him. And Palin IS NOT another Reagan (and if in fact the right thinks that she is, then they definitely need a collective lobotomy).
My answer would be, "It has to be the first option, because, with the second one I have no idea what the hell you're talking about".
Rusty, I saw no one "rewriting" history except you. Which you did when you denied anonymous' accurate description of the Reagan era.
The question, double be, was what do I, Will Hart, find more irritating......Also, I've found that partisan firebrands usually don't make for reliable Presidential historians. If it doesn't bother you too much, I think I'll look to people like Doug Brinkley and Doris Kearns Goodwin for perspective.
Post a Comment