Another Newtonian Physic

Every time I think that Newt Gingrich can't possibly go any lower, he ends up going significantly lower. It seems as if the former speaker is now giving credence to the despicable words of one Dinesh D'Souza; that President Obama's father was a "philandering, inebriated African socialist, who raged against the world for denying him the realization of his anti-colonial ambitions" (I guess that Mr.s D'Souza - his own people having been victimized by European colonialism - and Gingrich represent the PRO-colonial wing of the Republican party), that the President's father was also a "polygamist", a "wife beater", and a "drunk driver", and that the President himself is "only living out his father's dream, that the "invisible father provides the inspiration and that the "son dutifully gets the job done, and that "America today is governed by a ghost." Mr. Gingrich calls these "assessments" by D'Souza "the most profound insights I have read in the last six years about Barack Obama and, yes, agrees with D'Souza that President Obama has indeed been pursuing a "Kenyan anti-colonial agenda."...............................................................................................WHERE DO I EVEN START? Hm, how 'bout here. Let us assume that everything Mr. D'Souza has said about President Obama's father is accurate (no, it apparently isn't but, just for the sake of argument, I'm saying). Since when in this country do we punish the son for the crimes of the father? Joe Kennedy Sr. was frigging anti-Semite/Nazi sympathizer who got his sorry ass canned by FDR in the '30s. All of this, me-buckos, and, yet, HIS SONS (JFK and RFK, especially, but, yes, Teddy, too) grew up to be great American heroes. Why couldn't the same ultimately be true for President Obama? I mean, come on here, he isn't even half-way through his first term in office................................................................................................And then there are the merits (or lack thereof) of Mr. Gingrich's specific charge. I mean, think about it, folks. He's calling a guy who recently sent 30,000 American troops to Afghanistan and who's frigging bombing the tar out of northern Pakistan a Kenyan anti-colonial. Does that frigging make any sense - at all? And what about, too, the fact that he blew those Somali pirates to hell and back? Anti-colonial - yeah, right................................................................................................Look, folks, I do not in any way enjoy this (i.e., the ripping of new ones). But what Mr.s Gingrich and D'Souza are doing here is flat-out wrong. Yes, Mr. Obama is a flawed President/person (and, yes, the citizenry is free to vote him out if they wish to), but he's also a decent man and he does NOT deserve this type of treatment and innuendo............................................................................................P.S. Before anybody accuses me of partisanship here, please, let it be known, I also defended Mr.s Bush (charges of Nazism) and McCain (charges of collaborating with the North Vietnamese) when they were being smeared. Consistency, folks, is what I'm mostly striving for here.