Rusty was "tweaking" dmarks? I didn't take her comment that way. Perhaps Rusty is just trying to determine if she and Rachel Maddow would be compatible?
Seeing as Rusty is a Conservative (and a selfish jerk), I doubt Rachel Maddow would be interested in her.
She made up a story in 2009 and she consistently only gives one side (replete with only one set of data) to an argument. That constitutes straight propaganda to me.
I wasn't making a general comment about Liberals and Conservatives dating. I just don't think Rachel Maddow would be interested in her (Rusty). I think they're probably both "bulls".
WD said: "I hope they don't voice incorrect opinions about her doing propaganda."
That's up to you. You tend to be the only person around here that labels news "propaganda" merely because you dislike what is being said.
The quotation you gave with someone else accusing her of propaganda was merely in reaction to your silly claim of others doing it.
"If propaganda is what you want... I suggest Fox News."
Using your definition of propaganda (meaning news, opinion, and presentation of facts that does not meet your approval for strict ideological conformity) of course they do.
dmarks: Using your definition of propaganda (meaning news, opinion, and presentation of facts that does not meet your approval for strict ideological conformity) of course they do.
Eva Le Gallienne, Lilyan Tashman, Tallulah Bankhead, and Dorothy Sebastion
14 comments:
I hope no one mentions Rachel Maddow in the comments on this one as they did on the last.
No good. Not good at all.
Soooooo,in her relationship is Rachel Maddow the girl or is she the bull?
Rusty trying to tweak dmarks, JM trying to tweak me. I love it!
dmarks: I hope no one mentions Rachel Maddow in the comments on this one as they did on the last.
I hope they don't voice incorrect opinions about her doing propaganda.
Something along the lines of... "to even imply that this woman doesn't do propaganda is absolutely laughable".
Because that opinion simply isn't accurate. Rachel Maddow doesn't do propaganda. If propaganda is what you want... I suggest Fox Nooz.
Rusty was "tweaking" dmarks? I didn't take her comment that way. Perhaps Rusty is just trying to determine if she and Rachel Maddow would be compatible?
Seeing as Rusty is a Conservative (and a selfish jerk), I doubt Rachel Maddow would be interested in her.
She made up a story in 2009 and she consistently only gives one side (replete with only one set of data) to an argument. That constitutes straight propaganda to me.
Conservatives only date conservatives and liberals only date liberals - how boring/insular/intellectually stultifying.
I wasn't making a general comment about Liberals and Conservatives dating. I just don't think Rachel Maddow would be interested in her (Rusty). I think they're probably both "bulls".
I've seen a lot of bulls date other bulls.
Not mentioning Rachel Maddow? ...
WD said: "I hope they don't voice incorrect opinions about her doing propaganda."
That's up to you. You tend to be the only person around here that labels news "propaganda" merely because you dislike what is being said.
The quotation you gave with someone else accusing her of propaganda was merely in reaction to your silly claim of others doing it.
"If propaganda is what you want... I suggest Fox News."
Using your definition of propaganda (meaning news, opinion, and presentation of facts that does not meet your approval for strict ideological conformity) of course they do.
Will said: "Conservatives only date conservatives and liberals only date liberals - how boring/insular/intellectually stultifying."
Not true! Conservative Mary Matalin married liberal James Carville.
Or did she marry Nosferatu? I don't quite recall anymore.
dmarks: Using your definition of propaganda (meaning news, opinion, and presentation of facts that does not meet your approval for strict ideological conformity) of course they do.
That isn't my definition.
Post a Comment