Monday, May 26, 2008
Kennedy and Vietnam
Here are some facts about John F. Kennedy that I thought most people already knew. Being that I was mistaken, let us review......................................The first point is that this President, at least as much as his predecessor, was a staunch/virulent anti-Communist. This is reflected in his rhetoric as well as his actions. He was also a strong proponent of the "domino theory" (this, according to his closest advisers; Bundy, McNamara) and, yes, he applied this clearly to the situation in Vietnam. I cite, specifically, his first speech as President, where he stated unequivocally that one of our main goals should be to prevent Communist domination of South Vietnam, and National Security Action memo 52, which essentially said the same thing..................................Couple this, I'm saying, with his goal of financing the South's army from 150,000 to 170,000, his increase of U.S. military advisers to 12,000, and, especially, his recommendation that U.S. special forces (trained in guerrilla tactics) be employed for counter-insurgency and, yes, you kind of get the picture here...................................Granted, by 1963, Kennedy, sensing that a military victory was an improbability (the pragmatic side of Kennedy) and clearly becoming disillusioned with the Diem regime, appeared to be leaning toward a lessening of our presence in that region. BUT, it also must be stated, folks, this was purely a Realpolitik conclusion by Kennedy. He didn't suddenly start thinking that maybe Ho Chi Minh....was in fact the ANSWER, a small-d democrat in wolf's clothing only, etc.. No, not even remotely so, I'm saying.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Fill me in, I'm not getting it.
I had been debating some of these points with another blogger. It was his opinion that Kennedy was enlightened from the get go. The record clearly shows, however, that he wasn't. All things considered, though, it wasn't a bad record - compared to the 58,000deaths shared by LBJ and Nixon.
"I had been debating some of these points with another blogger. It was his opinion that Kennedy was enlightened from the get go."
Sorry Will I never said that.
What i said exactly was;
"Kennedy I think, originally bought the "domino theory" but by the spring and summer of 1963 could see it wasn't a war of communist aggression but a war of national liberation the third the Vietnamese peoples had fought. As a result he was making changes when he was murdered."
I got it from your very own website, not too hard for you to find I think.(around the 24th comment) This means you exactly like Bill O'Rielly make up dishonest talking points instead of checking what others really said. It seems for some reason you now seem as dishonest as he is.
Can't think of a reason why, but maybe you can spin it like he usually does.
I've been sitting back and watching this debate for a while now, and i have to ask, WHY do you and volt just ignore, try to bury or gloss over and fail to address any logical points that Utah Savage and Tom make........Will Tom clearly just caught you in a lie, and Volt you have been spinning like a top and trying bury deflect and derasil any and every point Utah Savage has made............its almost like they are talking to a brick wall or a spinning top.
Post a Comment