On the George Zimmerman Trial 5

Mr. Zimmerman used terrible judgement. He should have never, ever, gotten out of that vehicle. But he did, and terrible judgement isn't against the law. What the prosecution really needed to prove here was that Mr. Zimmerman got out of that vehicle with the express intent to murder Trayvon Martin (and, please, keep in mind here that Mr. Zimmerman had already spoken with the police and was fully expecting them to arrive on the scene in minutes) - and I personally don't think that they've accomplished that..............................................................................P.S. I also think that it's important to keep in mind here that Mr. Martin had a solid four minutes in which he easily could have "escaped" and gotten back home (his father's house was less than a 100 yards from where the incidence took place). The fact that he failed to utilize this opportunity is an aspect of the evidence that seemingly supports Mr. Zimmerman..............................................................................Now, this isn't to say that I totally buy George Zimmerman's story. I don't. I don't, for example, think that he got out of the car simply to get an address, and I buy even less his assertion that there was a struggle for the gun. But I also tend to agree with one of the pundits who I recently saw on cable. According to this person, it is normal for a witness's testimony to change over repeated renderings, and that it is the person who tells the identical story over and over (in a rote way) who is more than likely lying.