On the Fact that Even Though Stalin Had Killed Far More People than Hitler by 1941 and Had Even Brutalized the Poles to a Far Greater Extent During the Two Countries' Respective Invasions, it Still Hasn't Adequately Been Explained Why it Would Have Been Morally Repugnant to Compromise with One Murderous Dictator but Not Morally Repugnant to Openly Embrace and Even Collaborate with Another, Equally Pugnacious One

One of the critical elements of WW2 that still remains off-limits to historical dialogue, I guess (probably because the Americans and British had to turn Hitler into Satan to justify the 60,000,000 deaths and all of Eastern Europe becoming a Soviet slave-state......but I digress). Kinda' strange, huh?