Tuesday, March 4, 2008
Logic Lacking....Again!
Correct me if I'm wrong here, folks, but didn't the neocons/Bush water-carriers just several months ago say that "Al Qaeda In Iraq" had in fact already been vanquished? They said it as part of their claim that the "surge" was "working" - remember? Yeah? Well, guess what, kids, damned if these same sons of bitches aren't back-peddling/saying in effect that, NO, we can't abandon Iraq now....because "Al Qaeda in Iraq" (drum-roll, please) HASN'T BEEN DEFEATED YET!!! It's like, wow, huh? Talk about a double-headed argument. I mean, seriously, they've either got to be lying now....or they were frigging lying then. It's got to be one or the other, me-buckos, ONE OR THE OTHER. ...................................Ha!, not that they couldn't have been lying both times. THAT is no doubt possible, too (bastards being the way that they are and all)......................................P.S. Of course, Mr. O'Reilly, for one, he's already hedging his bets a bit - focusing on the high cost of oil now as the main reason for us to not get out of Iraq. Incredible, huh? It has to make you wonder what the excuse is going to be next week. Secular progressives in Arabia? I can almost hear it now.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Wasn't "to keep the costs of oil down" one of the reasons we went in and took out Saddam? How about, "We will pay for this war with the income from oil sales" It is unbelievable that the sheeple believe this shiite.
I kind of remember WMD as the main reason, though, yeah, they did in fact say that oil revenues would pay for the fiasco. No bout a doubt it!
Post a Comment