Wednesday, May 21, 2008
P.S.
I'm not intending to argue the merits of what is better, a 35% or 39% rate. The only point I'm making is that 39% marginal rates, if in fact that's what Hillary is proposing, does not in any way, shape, or form constitute socialism. And to make this claim, folks, is pure demagoguery - even for Sean Hannity, I'm saying.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
What the hell is a tax break for millionaires other than socialism or welfare for the uber-rich?
Tax fairness is a very subjective topic. Personally, I'm in favor of a mildly graduating tax system that has the rich pay somewhat more but that doesn't stifle incentive. I could be wrong, though.
Post a Comment