Wednesday, May 21, 2008

P.S.

I'm not intending to argue the merits of what is better, a 35% or 39% rate. The only point I'm making is that 39% marginal rates, if in fact that's what Hillary is proposing, does not in any way, shape, or form constitute socialism. And to make this claim, folks, is pure demagoguery - even for Sean Hannity, I'm saying.

2 comments:

  1. What the hell is a tax break for millionaires other than socialism or welfare for the uber-rich?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tax fairness is a very subjective topic. Personally, I'm in favor of a mildly graduating tax system that has the rich pay somewhat more but that doesn't stifle incentive. I could be wrong, though.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.