On the Fact that (According to Countless Historians; Charles Adams, Lochlainn Seabrook, Robert Henry, Eric Sheppard, J. Harvey Mathes, etc.) the Reconstruction Ku Klux Klan Did Not Begin as an Anti-Black Organization but Rather as an Anti-Carpetbagger and Anti-Scallywag One (Yes, They Eventually Did Target Some Blacks but Only the Ones that Teamed Up with the Carpetbaggers and Scallywags to Wreak Havoc Upon the Defenseless and Disenfranchised Southern Families; Amongst the Atrocities Included Extortion, Intimidation, Rape, Murder, Plunder, and Arson)

No one likes being occupied (just ask the Spaniards of the 8th to the 15th Century, the Irish of the 16th to the 19th Century, the Filipinos of the 19th and early 20th Century, The Hindus Right up to 1948, the Vietnamese of the 1940s, '50s and '60s, the Iraqis of the early 21st Century, etc., etc.), and they especially detest it when it involves violence, dispossession, and humiliation...….And where exactly do these Yankee court historians think that the racist KKK (which was established in 1915 and which bore no resemblance to the Reconstruction KKK) came from, if not from this toxic cauldron of pitting one group against another (kind of sounds like today with the SJWs, huh?)? Of course there are unintended consequences (in this instance, Reconstruction being to the KKK what the Treaty of Versailles was to Hitler), for Christ!!