Sunday, November 11, 2012

Switched at Birth?

I can't help but wonder sometimes what the country would have been like if this Bush had run in 2000 and not the other. You?

at

10 comments:

  1. dmarksNovember 11, 2012 at 9:08 PM

    As long as it wasn't Neil.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Will "take no prisoners" HartNovember 11, 2012 at 9:23 PM

    Forgot about him.

    ReplyDelete
  3. dmarksNovember 12, 2012 at 3:54 AM

    Neil was involved in shady Savings-and-Loan deals. We can't have a President (cough....1992-2000 ...cough) who ever had anything to do with that!

    ReplyDelete
  4. BB-IdahoNovember 12, 2012 at 3:30 PM

    Jeb came through relatively unscathed .

    ReplyDelete
  5. dmarksNovember 12, 2012 at 5:35 PM

    Kind of weird when a supposedly scholarly paper from a supposed PhD like that gets the name of a President wrong, BB.

    ReplyDelete
  6. BB-IdahoNovember 12, 2012 at 5:59 PM

    Perhaps he made a taipo ?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Will "take no prisoners" HartNovember 12, 2012 at 7:15 PM

    BB Idaho, who were probably the 2 most honest Presidents of the 20th Century? Carter and Ford, right? I'm just sayin' (the relationship between honesty and greatness not being all that positive).

    ReplyDelete
  8. dmarksNovember 13, 2012 at 3:20 AM

    Not a typo, BB. One of the first things to know about George W. Bush is that he is not a Jr.

    ReplyDelete
  9. BB-IdahoNovember 13, 2012 at 6:28 AM

    Will, there is some merit in 'honest politician' being used as an example of 'oxymoron'.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Will "take no prisoners" HartNovember 13, 2012 at 8:15 AM

    Indeed, and at the very least a rarity.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.