tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1327826536005692170.post8580003805827229695..comments2023-08-24T07:27:12.657-07:00Comments on Contra O'Reilly: On the Fact that the Pentagon Once Predicted (Circa 2003) that by 2013 Climate Change Would Flood California with Inland Seas and that Parts of the Netherlands Would Be Unlivable (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/1/pentagon-wrestles-with-false-climate-predictions-a/?page=all)Will "take no prisoners" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02315659209094683602noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1327826536005692170.post-33657660296497636132016-01-11T15:57:47.618-08:002016-01-11T15:57:47.618-08:00The best plan for "climate change" is a)...The best plan for "climate change" is a) prosperity and development (climate deaths are down by over 95% and that I believe is a by-product of economic progress) and b) adaptation (prevention is anywhere from 3 to 50 times more expensive and probably not remotely possible). And when have these people ever been right? I'm still waiting for one of their predictions to come true. Will "take no prisoners" Harthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02315659209094683602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1327826536005692170.post-22227983035080026312016-01-11T11:49:56.819-08:002016-01-11T11:49:56.819-08:00Back when I was on active duty, long range plannin...Back when I was on active duty, long range planning often involved the after effect<br />of nuclear war (presumably still does). They do the same for climate change. It is called <a href="http://archive.defense.gov/pubs/150724-congressional-report-on-national-implications-of-climate-change.pdf?source=govdelivery" rel="nofollow">contingency planning</a> . At its best, it keeps them ahead of the game and at a minimum<br />it falls under the old pentagon axiom 'to thine own ass be true'.<br />BB-Idahohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01388509941702241290noreply@blogger.com