tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1327826536005692170.post8408575874495756213..comments2023-08-24T07:27:12.657-07:00Comments on Contra O'Reilly: A Mandatory ClarificationWill "take no prisoners" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02315659209094683602noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1327826536005692170.post-46715464872289024902014-02-18T18:33:22.411-08:002014-02-18T18:33:22.411-08:00I guess I can say I am on board. I am resistive to...I guess I can say I am on board. I am resistive toward mandates, and don't want them done lightly.<br /><br />However, your (B) mandate really means welfare for the needy, right? So that's always been fine with me. And (a) is not so bad, since it does not involve mandates to the most dangerous plutocrats of all: the federal government.<br /><br />There, lets give it a go.<br /><br />However, I do not have the final word on it. Far from it. Those who favor handouts to big corporations (in the form of forced business) or giving more power to the already grossly over-powerful central government already have too much say in this.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.com