tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1327826536005692170.post8206917289335618054..comments2023-08-24T07:27:12.657-07:00Comments on Contra O'Reilly: The Truth About True ColorsWill "take no prisoners" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02315659209094683602noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1327826536005692170.post-8462882374912723822010-10-22T13:58:37.638-07:002010-10-22T13:58:37.638-07:00Obama can stop these unfair discharges for the nex...Obama can stop these unfair discharges for the next 2 (possibly 6) years. It is absolutely the right thing to do, IMO.....As for the next President overturning the order (hopefully the Congress will act in the interim), I say let him/her try. The public by then will go absolutely ballistic.Will "take no prisoners" Harthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02315659209094683602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1327826536005692170.post-40124062278229961952010-10-22T10:39:36.874-07:002010-10-22T10:39:36.874-07:00Romney will NOT be "taken to task" for w...Romney will NOT be "taken to task" for what he did as governor. They idolize Reagan despite the fact that he ran up the debt and granted amnesty to illegal immigrants. If you vote Republican you're either a hypocrite or a deluded sheep.<br /><br />As for DADT, I'm having serious doubts as to whether it will be repealed (or suspended) under Obama. Suspension was one of the first things he should have done upon becoming president. But, yes, he wants Congress to do it because he's worried about the political implications. <br /><br />I don't know what the point of suspending it would be unless he's certain it can be done away with during his presidency though... soldiers would still have to worry about it being reinstated under the next (possibly Republican) president.Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.com